Environmentalist: Many critics argue that shifting to 100% renewable energy is too expensive for developing nations. However, if we consider the long-term costs of climate-related disasters, such as floods and droughts, the transition is actually a massive cost-saving measure. \nWhich of the following statements supports the environmentalist’s claim?
Şıklar
Developing nations have abundant fossil fuel reserves that are easy to extract.
The initial setup cost of solar panels has increased significantly in recent years.
Renewable energy technologies are still in their infancy and require more research.
Preventing a climate crisis is cheaper than repairing the damage caused by one.
Global trade agreements often prioritize industrial growth over ecological safety.
Çözüm Açıklaması
Çevreci, yenilenebilir enerjiye geçişin 'maliyet tasarrufu' (cost-saving) olduğunu, çünkü iklim felaketlerinin (sel, kuraklık) uzun vadeli maliyetlerinin çok daha yüksek olduğunu savunuyor. D şıkkı, 'bir krizi önlemenin, verdiği zararı onarmaktan daha ucuz olduğu' düşüncesiyle bu tezi doğrudan destekler.