Professor Aris argues that the sudden abandonment of the 'Code of Silence' among the nomadic tribes of the Silk Road was not a result of \texternal coercion but a shift in internal survival values. He notes that the tribes who maintained the code during the 'Great Aridity' faced total \textinction, while those who shared water-well locations thrived. \nBased on Professor Aris's observation, what can be deduced about the tribes that survived?
Şıklar
They must have valued tribal secrecy more than the biological survival of their kinsmen.
They could have maintained the 'Code of Silence' if the environmental conditions had remained stable.
The surviving tribes can't have understood the importance of the 'Code of Silence' in their traditional culture.
They must have undergone a radical shift in their normative framework to prioritize collective pragmatism over traditional isolationism.
They might have been forced by \texternal em\pires to reveal their secrets during the drought.
Çözüm Açıklaması
Bu soru, toplumsal normların çevresel faktörlerle nasıl değiştiğini analiz eder. Hayatta kalan kabilelerin, hayatta kalmak için geleneksel 'sessizlik kodunu' (secrecy) terk edip bilgi paylaşımına (pragmatism) geçtikleri belirtilmiştir. 'Must have undergone' ifadesi, bu değişimin kaçınılmaz bir zorunluluk sonucu gerçekleştiğine dair güçlü bir çıkarım sağlar. D şıkkı, değerler sistemindeki bu radikal değişimi akademik bir dille ifade eder.
Video Çözüm
AI ile video çözüm oluştur
İnteraktif Çözüm
Adım adım, sesli ve animasyonlu çözüm. Quiz ile kendini test et!