In a hypothetical 'Post-Scarcity' economy where all physical needs are met by machines, the value of 'Hard Work' has vanished, replaced by 'Aesthetic Contribution'. A citizen who spends all day doing nothing but staring at a wall is socially condemned. What is the most likely deduction for this condemnation?
Şıklar
The citizen must be working hard in secret, which violates the new norm of avoiding all forms of traditional labor.
Staring at a wall can't be considered an aesthetic contribution, thus failing the societal expectation of active creative engagement.
They should have provided the citizen with better machines so that he wouldn't have to stare at a wall all day.
The society might have been more successful if they had kept the value of hard work instead of shifting to aesthetics.
He must have been a philosopher in the old world, trying to bring back the forgotten norms of deep contemplation.
Çözüm Açıklaması
Yeni bir toplum yapısında (Post-Scarcity) değerlerin nasıl değiştiğini analiz eden bir sorudur. 'Hard Work' yerine 'Aesthetic Contribution' (Estetik Katkı) değer haline gelmişse, birinin kınanması (condemned) bu yeni değere katkı sağlamadığı içindir. 'Can't be considered' ifadesiyle yapılan çıkarım, toplumsal normun ihlalini mantıksal bir çerçeveye oturtur.
Video Çözüm
AI ile video çözüm oluştur
İnteraktif Çözüm
Adım adım, sesli ve animasyonlu çözüm. Quiz ile kendini test et!