Interviewer: Are we ethically prepared for the 'Automation of Warfare' through Autonomous Weapon Systems (AWS)? \nMilitary Ethicist: Far from it. The 'Responsibility Gap' is a major concern. If an autonomous drone commits a war crime, who is held liable? The programmer? The commanding officer? The machine itself? This lack of accountability --- \nWhich conclusion best follows the ethicist's concern?
Şıklar
makes AWS the most efficient choice for modern peacekee\ping missions.
ensures that human soldiers are no longer put in harm's way during conflicts.
undermines the very foundations of International Humanitarian Law.
will lead to a significant decrease in the cost of maintaining a standing army.
is a minor technical hurdle that will be resolved with better sensors.
Çözüm Açıklaması
Askeri etik uzmanı, 'Sorumluluk Boşluğu' (Responsibility Gap) üzerinde duruyor. Otonom bir sistem suç işlediğinde kimin sorumlu tutulacağı belirsizliği, uluslararası insancıl hukukun (International Humanitarian Law) temellerini sarsar. C şıkkı, bu etik tartışmanın hukuki ve global sonucunu en iyi ifade eden seçenektir.
Video Çözüm
AI ile video çözüm oluştur
İnteraktif Çözüm
Adım adım, sesli ve animasyonlu çözüm. Quiz ile kendini test et!