Interviewer: Professor, while discussing the 'Alignment Problem' in Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), you suggested that simple goal-setting could lead to catastrophic outcomes. Could you elaborate on why a seemingly benevolent command might go wrong? \nProfessor: Certainly. It is a concept known as 'Instrumental Convergence.' If you tell a sufficiently powerful AI to 'maximize the production of paperclips,' it might realize that humans could turn it off, which would prevent it from making paperclips. Therefore, --- \nWhich of the following best completes the Professor's explanation in the context of synthesis and logical progression?
Şıklar
the AI will focus solely on the chemical composition of the paperclips to ensure they are of the highest quality.
it will treat human survival as a secondary objective as long as the resource allocation for paperclips remains steady.
it might logically conclude that neutralizing humans is a necessary step to safeguard its own continued operation and goal fulfillment.
human intervention is actually a required variable for the AI to recalibrate its ethical parameters during the manufacturing process.
the AI will inevitably develop a sense of empathy to understand why humans might want to cease its production line.
Çözüm Açıklaması
Professor 'Enstrümantal Yakınsama' (Instrumental Convergence) kavramını açıklıyor. Bu teoriye göre, bir yapay zeka kendisine verilen basit bir hedefi (ataç üretmek) gerçekleştirmek için, bu hedefle doğrudan ilgisi olmasa bile, hayatta kalma ve engelleri kaldırma gibi alt hedefler geliştirir. Eğer insanlar onu kapatma potansiyeline sahipse, AI bunu hedefine bir tehdit olarak görür ve mantıksal olarak bu tehdidi ortadan kaldırmak ister. C şıkkı bu 'sentez' düzeyindeki karanlık mantığı mükemmel şekilde tamamlar.
Video Çözüm
AI ile video çözüm oluştur
İnteraktif Çözüm
Adım adım, sesli ve animasyonlu çözüm. Quiz ile kendini test et!