The 19th-century avant-garde artist Julian Thorne destroyed his final master\piece, 'The Mirror of Truth,' just hours before his death, des\pite his lifelong devotion to the 'Value of Artistic Legacy.' In his final diary entry, he wrote: 'The audience seeks a reflection of their own vanity, not the weight of existence.' \nWhat is the most sophisticated deduction regarding Thorne’s act of destruction?
Şıklar
He might have been suffering from a temporary mental breakdown caused by his impending death.
He must have concluded that the public's current normative values were fundamentally incompatible with the truth conveyed in his work.
He could have sold the painting for a fortune if he hadn't valued his legacy so much.
The painting can't have been as valuable as his previous works, so he chose to destroy it.
He must have intended to create a new norm where artists destroy their work to increase its mystery.
Çözüm Açıklaması
Thorne'un kendi eserini yok etmesi, ömür boyu savunduğu 'sanatsal miras' değeriyle çelişir. Ancak günlüğündeki ifade, izleyicinin (toplumun) gerçekliği değil kendi kibrini aradığını belirtmektedir. Buradan yapılacak en derin çıkarım; Thorne'un, toplumun mevcut değer yargılarının (vanity), kendi sanatının taşıdığı gerçeklikle (truth) uyuşmadığına karar vermiş olmasıdır. 'Must have concluded' bu güçlü felsefi çıkarımı karşılar.
Video Çözüm
AI ile video çözüm oluştur
İnteraktif Çözüm
Adım adım, sesli ve animasyonlu çözüm. Quiz ile kendini test et!